Balloon Bear Expeditions · Grade 5 · Science · Story 5.04

The Boat That Would Not Balance

Lesson plan, educator guide and printable learner records

Suggested sequence: 65 minutes, split across sessions as needed. Use this introduction within your wider learning plan. Print sheets to record learner work; this page does not save learner responses.

Lesson plan

Materials

Six equal-sized foil sheets for three paired trials; shallow water tray; identical oversized counters; ruler; towel; paper and pencil. An adult prepares the tray and checks counters. Use room-temperature water.

Safety

Use a shallow tabletop tray, keep the floor dry and keep water away from electricity. No outdoor-water test is needed. Empty the tray after the activity. Real boating requires its own adult supervision and appropriate fitted safety equipment; this model activity does not establish boating competence.

Teaching Sequence

Find out first5 minutesAsk whether equal quantities of foil must carry equal loads in every shape. Ask whether floating always means stable.
Read the story10 minutesRead pages 1–20, pausing at the balance and cargo comparisons.
Teach explicitly10 minutesUse a hand-drawn force diagram. Explain that a boat floating at rest has buoyant force equal to its weight. Distinguish tipping from sinking.
Investigate and practise30 minutesTest two boat designs with identical counters. Repeat three trials, using fresh matched foil models when damage changes the shape.
Review and extend10 minutesGraph the supported load counts, explain variation and recommend a design. Later test cargo position separately.

Timing is a suggested introductory sequence, not a legally required duration. Split it across sessions as needed.

Story teaching stops

Open a page below, then use Lesson & Guide in the book to return here.

Page 03 — Equal materials and a controlled comparison

Page 06 — Buoyant force

Page 07 — Balanced forces at rest

Page 10 — Recording the load test

Page 12 — Cargo position and stability

Page 14 — Repeated trials

Page 16 — Limits of a model

Page 20 — Reflection and next question

Educator guide

Primary Subject

Science

Secondary Connections

Counting, repeated measurements, simple graphs and explanatory writing

Curriculum Connection

Alberta Grade 5 science highlights include forces in water and buoyancy, alongside controlled experiments. This guide develops a model-boat comparison and selected explanations. Publisher objectives below do not represent the whole official force topic.

Scope

Introduced: buoyancy, weight, displacement and stability. Developed and assessed: choosing one design variable, controlling a test and supporting a conclusion with repeated observations. Still needed: further force and motion investigations and other science topics.

Prerequisites

Count equal loads accurately; distinguish a change from a constant; compare two shapes. Floating at rest involves balanced upward and downward forces. A model can float and still be unstable.

Publisher Learning Objectives

1. Describe the upward buoyant force and downward weight on a floating boat at rest.
2. Compare two boat shapes using equal foil quantities, identical loads and repeated trials.
3. Explain a design recommendation using results and a limitation.

Vocabulary

Buoyancy: the upward force a fluid exerts. Weight: gravitational force on an object. Displacement: water moved aside by a boat. Stability: resistance to tipping in the tested situation. Controlled comparison: a test with one deliberate change and other relevant conditions kept alike.

Educator discussion questions and answer guidance

1. What did you keep the same?
Answer guidance: Equal foil quantity, load pieces, water conditions, loading procedure and endpoint. Accept an honest admission that another variable was hard to control.
2. What did you change?
Answer guidance: The recorded hull shape. Cargo position should be a separate investigation.
3. What would make you more confident?
Answer guidance: Repeated trials, better matched folds, a stated endpoint and attention to alternative explanations.

Illustrative reasoning, not fabricated results: “If our broad design carries more counters in all three trials, we have evidence favouring that design under these conditions. Uneven folds or a different rim height could also affect the comparison.” A different outcome is valid evidence when the method and observations are reported accurately.

Adaptations And Extension

Let the adult make the matched hulls and have the learner predict, count and explain. Extend by investigating cargo placement while keeping hull shape unchanged. Add density later using an appropriate Grade 5 explanation.

Next Lesson

Explore other forces in water and additional force topics. Add further lessons rather than treating one successful boat as complete science coverage.

Canadian Home Education Use

Canada has provincial and territorial home-education frameworks rather than one national required subject list. These pilots retain the report’s Alberta-first planning approach. Families elsewhere can reuse the stories while matching the guides to their own approved or parent-selected plan and local requirements. In Alberta, parents choose resources consistent with the Home Education Regulation and are responsible for planning and evaluating the program. Use these dated work samples within that wider plan.

Curriculum And Home Education References

Government of Alberta. Current science curriculum highlights. https://www.alberta.ca/curriculum-science
Government of Alberta. Home education. https://www.alberta.ca/home-education

Connection checked October 2 2026. Exact official outcome identifiers must be verified for the chosen pathway before any claim of complete alignment.

Activity sheets

Main Activity

Compare two model hulls

Materials

Six equal-sized foil sheets for three paired trials; shallow water tray; identical oversized counters; ruler; towel; paper and pencil. An adult prepares the tray and checks counters. Use room-temperature water.

Safety

Use a shallow tabletop tray, keep the floor dry and keep water away from electricity. No outdoor-water test is needed. Empty the tray after the activity. Real boating requires its own adult supervision and appropriate fitted safety equipment; this model activity does not establish boating competence.

Method

1. Make one narrow and one broad model from equal foil sheets. Keep rim height as similar as feasible and record dimensions. The shape change is the investigation variable.
2. Float the first model. Add identical counters one at a time, placing each near the centre. Record the last count carried before water enters or the model tips. Choose and record the same endpoint for both designs.
3. Repeat for the second model in the same tray conditions. Complete three paired trials. Use new matched models if the foil becomes damaged.
4. Graph each trial separately. Compare the pattern, note variation and explain why material quality, folding or cargo placement could affect the result.

Learner recording sheet

Name: ________________________ Date: ______________

Our prediction and reason

The variable we change

Conditions we keep the same

Our shared endpoint

Narrow and broad model dimensions / sketches

TrialNarrow model countBroad model countEndpoint and notes
1________________________
2________________________
3________________________

Draw a graph of the supported counter counts for each design and trial

Our recommendation and evidence

One limitation or question for another test

Assessment & progress

Evidence

Save dated design sketches with measurements, three paired trial records, a graph and a short evidence-based recommendation. Record assistance and any change in the test method.

Success Criteria

Assess control of relevant variables, faithful records, a readable comparison and an explanation consistent with the data. Success is not awarded solely to the boat carrying the most counters.

Parent Progress Record

Portfolio record: learner name or initials; date; province or territory; chosen home-education pathway; parent-selected outcome; curriculum version if used; task evidence; assistance given; assessment judgement; next teaching step. Topic connections in these pilots are not exact official outcome-code mappings. Parents using provincial outcomes should add the verified identifiers from the chosen current program before recording full coverage.

Learner / date

Province or territory / home-education pathway

Selected outcome and curriculum version

Evidence retained

Assistance provided

Judgement: Developing / Secure for this task / Applying

Next teaching step